Files
magpie/internal/gateway
yetone c816c9f828 routing: a request answered by another model than the one asked for is marked, from the model the vendor's reply names (v on Discord #feedback: 模型路由情况其实有的时候还是想知道的,比如之前 openai 会把 sol 降智到 luna 这样的,现在只有走 s2a 和 newapi 这些网关服务才能明确看到) — magpie read the tokens off each reply but not the model it says answered, so a vendor serving sol's requests with luna looked, on the Routing page, like sol answering. The reply's model is now kept as it goes by, never delayed or changed: on a relayed reply by the usage sniffer, which already reads every event and JSON body (Chat Completions' model in its JSON and each chunk, the Responses API's response.model in response.created/completed and model in its JSON, Anthropic's message.model in message_start and model in its JSON); on a translated one from the decoders' start event, which already carried it (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, and Gemini Code Assist's modelVersion), streamed or collected; on a Claude subscription's from the CLI's message_start; and on Codex's own models relayed to the ChatGPT backend. It goes in Usage.Served (and so the request log), each try's Served and the route's (the last try's, when it answered), with Swapped when it is another model than the one the try sent the vendor. Vendors mostly echo a dated or pinned name, which is the same model: the names are compared without a maker or path prefix (openai/, models/, Bedrock's us.anthropic.), case, and a version at the end — a date (-2025-08-07, -20250929, -06-05), a build number (-0613, -001), Bedrock's -v1:0, -latest, -preview — so gpt-5 answered as gpt-5-2025-08-07 or claude-3-5-sonnet-latest as claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is not marked, while gpt-5 as gpt-5-mini, gpt-5 as gpt-5.1, claude-opus-4 as claude-opus-4-1-… and deepseek-v3 as deepseek-v2 are. A reply that names no model marks nothing. The Routing page's Requests list puts an amber "served luna" (实际 luna) tag by the answer, its title saying what it means, and the request's story a line "requested sol · served luna" (请求 sol · 实际 luna) with the same sentence; no border stripe, and picking the request leaves the page where it is. Cursor, Devin, Kiro and Qoder name the model they were asked for themselves, so they are never marked.
Tested with new internal/gateway/served_test.go: TestServedModelRecorded (fake vendors in each protocol, streamed and not, relayed — Anthropic, Chat, Responses — and translated — Chat from Anthropic, Anthropic from Chat, Anthropic from Responses — each answering luna (marked), sol-2026-01-01 and models/SOL (not): the route, its try and the request log keep the name, Swapped as said), TestServedModelUnnamed, TestSwappedModel (the names above), TestSniffServedModel and TestCodexOwnModelServedTraced; and new internal/gui/tests/routing-served.test.cjs in Chromium and WebKit, en and zh (the tag on the swapped request alone, whole and in its row, no left border, its title; the story's line; a click that doesn't move the page; the dated and unnamed ones unmarked). With three requests alone the Routing page above the list jiggles by a few to 70px in WebKit on its own (on main too, with no served model in the fixture), so the fixture lists six. go build -tags nogui (and GOOS=linux, GOOS=windows), go test -tags nogui ./... and all GUI tests (80) pass. Not tested against a real vendor serving another model.
2026-09-29 19:41:29 +08:00
..
routing: a request answered by another model than the one asked for is marked, from the model the vendor's reply names (v on Discord #feedback: 模型路由情况其实有的时候还是想知道的,比如之前 openai 会把 sol 降智到 luna 这样的,现在只有走 s2a 和 newapi 这些网关服务才能明确看到) — magpie read the tokens off each reply but not the model it says answered, so a vendor serving sol's requests with luna looked, on the Routing page, like sol answering. The reply's model is now kept as it goes by, never delayed or changed: on a relayed reply by the usage sniffer, which already reads every event and JSON body (Chat Completions' model in its JSON and each chunk, the Responses API's response.model in response.created/completed and model in its JSON, Anthropic's message.model in message_start and model in its JSON); on a translated one from the decoders' start event, which already carried it (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, and Gemini Code Assist's modelVersion), streamed or collected; on a Claude subscription's from the CLI's message_start; and on Codex's own models relayed to the ChatGPT backend. It goes in Usage.Served (and so the request log), each try's Served and the route's (the last try's, when it answered), with Swapped when it is another model than the one the try sent the vendor. Vendors mostly echo a dated or pinned name, which is the same model: the names are compared without a maker or path prefix (openai/, models/, Bedrock's us.anthropic.), case, and a version at the end — a date (-2025-08-07, -20250929, -06-05), a build number (-0613, -001), Bedrock's -v1:0, -latest, -preview — so gpt-5 answered as gpt-5-2025-08-07 or claude-3-5-sonnet-latest as claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is not marked, while gpt-5 as gpt-5-mini, gpt-5 as gpt-5.1, claude-opus-4 as claude-opus-4-1-… and deepseek-v3 as deepseek-v2 are. A reply that names no model marks nothing. The Routing page's Requests list puts an amber "served luna" (实际 luna) tag by the answer, its title saying what it means, and the request's story a line "requested sol · served luna" (请求 sol · 实际 luna) with the same sentence; no border stripe, and picking the request leaves the page where it is. Cursor, Devin, Kiro and Qoder name the model they were asked for themselves, so they are never marked.
2026-09-29 19:41:29 +08:00
provider: Antigravity's models at several levels are one model with those levels (#150: 统一 Antigravity 模型变体与客户端推理档位的映射) — Antigravity lists gemini-3.7-flash-low, -medium and -high as three models, "Gemini 3.7 Flash (Low)" …, so a client picked a level twice: once in the model, once as its reasoning effort, with no telling which won. Now ids that are one id with an effort word after it (-low, -medium, -high, -extra-low, -minimal, -xhigh) are one model, gemini-3.7-flash "Gemini 3.7 Flash", declaring only the levels there are (low,medium,high; Gemini 3.1 Pro low,high), so Codex, Pi and the rest get reasoning levels for it. The level a variant is at is what Antigravity's name says where each name says a different one (gemini-3.5-flash-extra-low is "(Low)", gemini-3.5-flash-low "(Medium)"), else its id's word; a model only named like another (gemini-3-flash-agent, "Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)"; gemini-pro-agent) or with no sibling (gpt-oss-120b-medium) stays as listed. A request asks for the variant the effort picks, an effort it lacks at the nearest level (xhigh is high; medium on low/high is high); with none asked, the id without a level if Antigravity has one, else high — what Gemini 3 does unasked — else the highest. A variant's request carries no thinkingLevel, so the id and the level can't disagree. An old variant id still works: as named with no effort, and moved to the effort asked for. Saved picks and agents set to a variant (antigravity/gemini-3.7-flash-high) are moved to the family, at that level where the agent's own is unset, as Cursor's are. For Gemini 3 models without variants, medium now goes as medium to Flash (which takes minimal/low/medium/high) and still as high to Pro (low/high). Tested against the list an account's fetchAvailableModels gave (sandbox cache)
2026-09-28 20:10:00 +08:00
providers: Claude Code is signed in to its next account once the one it is on is spent, as Codex is, and an account keeps its own affinity, backoff and usage across a switch (#208 Cyb3rN8: Claude Code 用自己的模型时,登录账号额度用满不会自动切换 · #209: Smart 选中的账号和 Claude Code 登录账号互不同步…切换登录账号还会把按 id 记的状态串到另一个账号上) — Claude Code on its own model asks Anthropic as the account it is signed in to, never through magpie, so with A spent its sessions got "You've hit your session limit" while the gateway had moved on to B. The Codex watcher (KeepCodexOnAnAccountWithRoom, now KeepOnAnAccountWithRoom, same place: started by the magpie serving the gateway, a minute in and every 5 minutes) now looks at Claude Code too: when the account it is signed in to is spent and another ticked account's allowance is known and has room, it is signed in to that one through SwitchLogin (credentials and .claude.json's oauthAccount), as Use on the Accounts page does; not when the Claude account was removed from magpie. The rule for #209: the sign-in follows Smart, not the other way round — it moves at the share Smart counts an account spent (provider.SpentShare = 98, which the gateway's usedShare now is), for Codex too (it moved at 100%). The Routing field of a Codex or Claude subscription with several accounts says so: routing picks the account for what comes through magpie; the agent on its own uses the one it is signed in to, moved on at 98%. Sessions already running keep the account they started with until restarted, as SwitchLogin says; routing Claude Code's own model through the gateway (the codexFailover way) is not done here. #209's second part was a real bug: the account the agent is on is the candidate "claude" and the others "claude@user", so a switch handed "claude" from A to B — a conversation A answered was kept on B and traced kept=true, and the Least used tokens and the backoff count followed the id. who(), routed.used and routed.failures are now keyed by restKey (provider@user, as rests already were); rest itself (group members, the trace) is unchanged. Tested with new TestClaudeSwitchedWhenSpent (sandbox HOME, keychain off, a fake usage endpoint: 97% stays, 98% signs Claude Code in to b — credentials and .claude.json — a stays ticked; on b it stays; both spent it stays), TestCodexSwitchedWhenUsedUp still passing, new TestLoginSwitchKeepsEachAccountItself (fails on main: the conversation went to b, kept) and new internal/gui/tests/routing-signin.test.cjs in Chromium and WebKit, en and zh; login-import and routing-kind GUI tests pass. go build -tags nogui (and GOOS=linux, GOOS=windows), go test -tags nogui ./... pass (TestUserPath, TestClaudeAccountNamedAsItsLogin, TestClaudeIdentityServedWhileAsked and TestCodexVersion timed out at 5s under the full run's load and pass on their own). Not tested against real Claude accounts or a running Claude Code.
2026-09-29 18:56:33 +08:00
routing: a request answered by another model than the one asked for is marked, from the model the vendor's reply names (v on Discord #feedback: 模型路由情况其实有的时候还是想知道的,比如之前 openai 会把 sol 降智到 luna 这样的,现在只有走 s2a 和 newapi 这些网关服务才能明确看到) — magpie read the tokens off each reply but not the model it says answered, so a vendor serving sol's requests with luna looked, on the Routing page, like sol answering. The reply's model is now kept as it goes by, never delayed or changed: on a relayed reply by the usage sniffer, which already reads every event and JSON body (Chat Completions' model in its JSON and each chunk, the Responses API's response.model in response.created/completed and model in its JSON, Anthropic's message.model in message_start and model in its JSON); on a translated one from the decoders' start event, which already carried it (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, and Gemini Code Assist's modelVersion), streamed or collected; on a Claude subscription's from the CLI's message_start; and on Codex's own models relayed to the ChatGPT backend. It goes in Usage.Served (and so the request log), each try's Served and the route's (the last try's, when it answered), with Swapped when it is another model than the one the try sent the vendor. Vendors mostly echo a dated or pinned name, which is the same model: the names are compared without a maker or path prefix (openai/, models/, Bedrock's us.anthropic.), case, and a version at the end — a date (-2025-08-07, -20250929, -06-05), a build number (-0613, -001), Bedrock's -v1:0, -latest, -preview — so gpt-5 answered as gpt-5-2025-08-07 or claude-3-5-sonnet-latest as claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is not marked, while gpt-5 as gpt-5-mini, gpt-5 as gpt-5.1, claude-opus-4 as claude-opus-4-1-… and deepseek-v3 as deepseek-v2 are. A reply that names no model marks nothing. The Routing page's Requests list puts an amber "served luna" (实际 luna) tag by the answer, its title saying what it means, and the request's story a line "requested sol · served luna" (请求 sol · 实际 luna) with the same sentence; no border stripe, and picking the request leaves the page where it is. Cursor, Devin, Kiro and Qoder name the model they were asked for themselves, so they are never marked.
2026-09-29 19:41:29 +08:00
gateway: Claude Desktop offers its thinking-effort picker for magpie's models that take reasoning levels (ARNO: 接入claude desktop后无法设置思考强度,不确定是哪里的问题) — in a gateway's mode Desktop reads no effort from /v1/models (IIt keeps id, display_name, description, supports_1m, anthropic_family_tier), and its model catalog must be Anthropic's signed file, so a model's levels come only from tIt in index.chunk-D3OyLXgG.js: let t=IC(e),n=HFt[t]??(UFt.test(t)?VFt:void 0). HFt is its own table (claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-sonnet-5, claude-opus-4-6/4-7/4-8, claude-opus-5), UFt /^(?:claude-)?(?:fable|mythos)(?:-|$)/ with VFt low…max, and IC the lowercased id with a "<label>.anthropic." prefix and a date taken off (qS). magpie's ids (provider/model, anthropic/magpie-<n>) were neither, so no model had the picker, not even a real Claude one. A model with reasoning levels is now listed as mythos-magpie-<n> (UFt matches; no haiku/sonnet/opus in it, so Desktop's small_fast pick is unchanged), or, for a real Claude model, as magpie-<n>.anthropic.<claude model> (IC reads it as that model, so HFt gives its own levels). One without levels is listed as before. aliased serves all three forms, with or without [1m]. Checked against Desktop's bundled Claude Code 2.1.280 in a sandbox HOME, pointed at a local logger: mythos-magpie-<n> goes out exactly as anthropic/magpie-<n> did (thinking adaptive, output_config.effort as picked, 32000 tokens); magpie-<n>.anthropic.claude-opus-4-8 goes out exactly as x/claude-opus-4-8 did, known as Opus 4.8 (no unrecognized_model warning, 64000 tokens). The effort then reaches the model fitted to its levels: Anthropic passthrough now fits output_config.effort as Chat's reasoning_effort and Responses' reasoning.effort already were (bodyEffort/withBodyEffort), so Desktop's max goes to a low/high model as high. VFt always thinks: Desktop offers no "off" for a non-Claude model with levels. A session saved on an old id must be moved once to the new entry in the picker; magpie still serves the old id.
2026-09-29 00:53:16 +08:00
gateway: Claude Desktop offers its thinking-effort picker for magpie's models that take reasoning levels (ARNO: 接入claude desktop后无法设置思考强度,不确定是哪里的问题) — in a gateway's mode Desktop reads no effort from /v1/models (IIt keeps id, display_name, description, supports_1m, anthropic_family_tier), and its model catalog must be Anthropic's signed file, so a model's levels come only from tIt in index.chunk-D3OyLXgG.js: let t=IC(e),n=HFt[t]??(UFt.test(t)?VFt:void 0). HFt is its own table (claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-sonnet-5, claude-opus-4-6/4-7/4-8, claude-opus-5), UFt /^(?:claude-)?(?:fable|mythos)(?:-|$)/ with VFt low…max, and IC the lowercased id with a "<label>.anthropic." prefix and a date taken off (qS). magpie's ids (provider/model, anthropic/magpie-<n>) were neither, so no model had the picker, not even a real Claude one. A model with reasoning levels is now listed as mythos-magpie-<n> (UFt matches; no haiku/sonnet/opus in it, so Desktop's small_fast pick is unchanged), or, for a real Claude model, as magpie-<n>.anthropic.<claude model> (IC reads it as that model, so HFt gives its own levels). One without levels is listed as before. aliased serves all three forms, with or without [1m]. Checked against Desktop's bundled Claude Code 2.1.280 in a sandbox HOME, pointed at a local logger: mythos-magpie-<n> goes out exactly as anthropic/magpie-<n> did (thinking adaptive, output_config.effort as picked, 32000 tokens); magpie-<n>.anthropic.claude-opus-4-8 goes out exactly as x/claude-opus-4-8 did, known as Opus 4.8 (no unrecognized_model warning, 64000 tokens). The effort then reaches the model fitted to its levels: Anthropic passthrough now fits output_config.effort as Chat's reasoning_effort and Responses' reasoning.effort already were (bodyEffort/withBodyEffort), so Desktop's max goes to a low/high model as high. VFt always thinks: Desktop offers no "off" for a non-Claude model with levels. A session saved on an old id must be moved once to the new entry in the picker; magpie still serves the old id.
2026-09-29 00:53:16 +08:00
gateway: Claude Desktop offers its thinking-effort picker for magpie's models that take reasoning levels (ARNO: 接入claude desktop后无法设置思考强度,不确定是哪里的问题) — in a gateway's mode Desktop reads no effort from /v1/models (IIt keeps id, display_name, description, supports_1m, anthropic_family_tier), and its model catalog must be Anthropic's signed file, so a model's levels come only from tIt in index.chunk-D3OyLXgG.js: let t=IC(e),n=HFt[t]??(UFt.test(t)?VFt:void 0). HFt is its own table (claude-sonnet-4-6, claude-sonnet-5, claude-opus-4-6/4-7/4-8, claude-opus-5), UFt /^(?:claude-)?(?:fable|mythos)(?:-|$)/ with VFt low…max, and IC the lowercased id with a "<label>.anthropic." prefix and a date taken off (qS). magpie's ids (provider/model, anthropic/magpie-<n>) were neither, so no model had the picker, not even a real Claude one. A model with reasoning levels is now listed as mythos-magpie-<n> (UFt matches; no haiku/sonnet/opus in it, so Desktop's small_fast pick is unchanged), or, for a real Claude model, as magpie-<n>.anthropic.<claude model> (IC reads it as that model, so HFt gives its own levels). One without levels is listed as before. aliased serves all three forms, with or without [1m]. Checked against Desktop's bundled Claude Code 2.1.280 in a sandbox HOME, pointed at a local logger: mythos-magpie-<n> goes out exactly as anthropic/magpie-<n> did (thinking adaptive, output_config.effort as picked, 32000 tokens); magpie-<n>.anthropic.claude-opus-4-8 goes out exactly as x/claude-opus-4-8 did, known as Opus 4.8 (no unrecognized_model warning, 64000 tokens). The effort then reaches the model fitted to its levels: Anthropic passthrough now fits output_config.effort as Chat's reasoning_effort and Responses' reasoning.effort already were (bodyEffort/withBodyEffort), so Desktop's max goes to a low/high model as high. VFt always thinks: Desktop offers no "off" for a non-Claude model with levels. A session saved on an old id must be moved once to the new entry in the picker; magpie still serves the old id.
2026-09-29 00:53:16 +08:00
providers: Claude Code is signed in to its next account once the one it is on is spent, as Codex is, and an account keeps its own affinity, backoff and usage across a switch (#208 Cyb3rN8: Claude Code 用自己的模型时,登录账号额度用满不会自动切换 · #209: Smart 选中的账号和 Claude Code 登录账号互不同步…切换登录账号还会把按 id 记的状态串到另一个账号上) — Claude Code on its own model asks Anthropic as the account it is signed in to, never through magpie, so with A spent its sessions got "You've hit your session limit" while the gateway had moved on to B. The Codex watcher (KeepCodexOnAnAccountWithRoom, now KeepOnAnAccountWithRoom, same place: started by the magpie serving the gateway, a minute in and every 5 minutes) now looks at Claude Code too: when the account it is signed in to is spent and another ticked account's allowance is known and has room, it is signed in to that one through SwitchLogin (credentials and .claude.json's oauthAccount), as Use on the Accounts page does; not when the Claude account was removed from magpie. The rule for #209: the sign-in follows Smart, not the other way round — it moves at the share Smart counts an account spent (provider.SpentShare = 98, which the gateway's usedShare now is), for Codex too (it moved at 100%). The Routing field of a Codex or Claude subscription with several accounts says so: routing picks the account for what comes through magpie; the agent on its own uses the one it is signed in to, moved on at 98%. Sessions already running keep the account they started with until restarted, as SwitchLogin says; routing Claude Code's own model through the gateway (the codexFailover way) is not done here. #209's second part was a real bug: the account the agent is on is the candidate "claude" and the others "claude@user", so a switch handed "claude" from A to B — a conversation A answered was kept on B and traced kept=true, and the Least used tokens and the backoff count followed the id. who(), routed.used and routed.failures are now keyed by restKey (provider@user, as rests already were); rest itself (group members, the trace) is unchanged. Tested with new TestClaudeSwitchedWhenSpent (sandbox HOME, keychain off, a fake usage endpoint: 97% stays, 98% signs Claude Code in to b — credentials and .claude.json — a stays ticked; on b it stays; both spent it stays), TestCodexSwitchedWhenUsedUp still passing, new TestLoginSwitchKeepsEachAccountItself (fails on main: the conversation went to b, kept) and new internal/gui/tests/routing-signin.test.cjs in Chromium and WebKit, en and zh; login-import and routing-kind GUI tests pass. go build -tags nogui (and GOOS=linux, GOOS=windows), go test -tags nogui ./... pass (TestUserPath, TestClaudeAccountNamedAsItsLogin, TestClaudeIdentityServedWhileAsked and TestCodexVersion timed out at 5s under the full run's load and pass on their own). Not tested against real Claude accounts or a running Claude Code.
2026-09-29 18:56:33 +08:00
routing: a request answered by another model than the one asked for is marked, from the model the vendor's reply names (v on Discord #feedback: 模型路由情况其实有的时候还是想知道的,比如之前 openai 会把 sol 降智到 luna 这样的,现在只有走 s2a 和 newapi 这些网关服务才能明确看到) — magpie read the tokens off each reply but not the model it says answered, so a vendor serving sol's requests with luna looked, on the Routing page, like sol answering. The reply's model is now kept as it goes by, never delayed or changed: on a relayed reply by the usage sniffer, which already reads every event and JSON body (Chat Completions' model in its JSON and each chunk, the Responses API's response.model in response.created/completed and model in its JSON, Anthropic's message.model in message_start and model in its JSON); on a translated one from the decoders' start event, which already carried it (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, and Gemini Code Assist's modelVersion), streamed or collected; on a Claude subscription's from the CLI's message_start; and on Codex's own models relayed to the ChatGPT backend. It goes in Usage.Served (and so the request log), each try's Served and the route's (the last try's, when it answered), with Swapped when it is another model than the one the try sent the vendor. Vendors mostly echo a dated or pinned name, which is the same model: the names are compared without a maker or path prefix (openai/, models/, Bedrock's us.anthropic.), case, and a version at the end — a date (-2025-08-07, -20250929, -06-05), a build number (-0613, -001), Bedrock's -v1:0, -latest, -preview — so gpt-5 answered as gpt-5-2025-08-07 or claude-3-5-sonnet-latest as claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is not marked, while gpt-5 as gpt-5-mini, gpt-5 as gpt-5.1, claude-opus-4 as claude-opus-4-1-… and deepseek-v3 as deepseek-v2 are. A reply that names no model marks nothing. The Routing page's Requests list puts an amber "served luna" (实际 luna) tag by the answer, its title saying what it means, and the request's story a line "requested sol · served luna" (请求 sol · 实际 luna) with the same sentence; no border stripe, and picking the request leaves the page where it is. Cursor, Devin, Kiro and Qoder name the model they were asked for themselves, so they are never marked.
2026-09-29 19:41:29 +08:00
groups: a routing group with a ChatGPT model in it offers Codex's ultra (TJHHHH: 似乎在使用路由时不支持ultra模式 — GPT-5.6 Terra · routing group in the Codex app had no ultra) — a group offers the reasoning levels its members have in common, and ultra (max, with Codex handing parts of the task to agents of its own) is a level of ChatGPT's own models alone, so the Terra group with codex/gpt-5.6-terra and the API's and Copilot's gpt-5.6-terra lost it and stopped at max. A group now offers ultra too when a member has it and every member that follows the agent's effort reaches max; one with a member below max, or with no ChatGPT model, is as before. At the gateway ultra was worse than missing: a Responses request made again for a member's own endpoint (Codex to a Chat or Anthropic member) read ultra as no effort at all and asked for none, and one passed on as it came sent a member whose levels magpie doesn't know "ultra" as it was. Ultra is now max to every member without an ultra of its own (or the nearest it has below), and a ChatGPT model keeps getting ultra, which it sends the backend as max as before. Tested with a new TestGroupUltra: the group's levels with and without a ChatGPT member and with a member at high, and Codex's ultra through the group to a member translated from Responses, a Chat member passed as it came and one with unknown levels (the levels and the translated and unknown-level cases fail on main). go build (and GOOS=windows) and go test -tags nogui ./... pass
2026-09-29 17:03:46 +08:00
gateway: a model that can't see images is given what a model that can says of them (让Magpie支持配置图像识别模型) — until now an image sent to a model the catalog knows takes text only was turned away in the latest turn and left out of older turns and tool results, so an agent on DeepSeek, GLM or any text-only model couldn't be shown a screenshot at all. Now each image in such a request is described once by the vision model and the description goes in its place, in every protocol (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, Gemini), current turn, older turns and tool results alike: "[Image, as <model> describes it for this model, which can't see images:] … [End of the image's description]". The describer is asked through the gateway itself (User-Agent magpie-vision/1, recorded as agent magpie), with a system prompt to transcribe text, code, errors and UI state exactly and not to answer or guess; images are described four at a time, and a description is kept (256, by model+image) since an agent sends a conversation's images again every turn, a failure not kept. An image of the latest turn that can't be described is a 502 saying why; one in an older turn is left out as before. Settings → Images → Image recognition picks the model: Automatic (a small model that sees — a Claude account's, a Codex account's, the cheapest of an API key's, another account's), Off (images turned away as before), or any model or group that sees; an id that doesn't resolve is refused. In a routing group the description is made only when a text-only member is actually tried, so a rule that routes images to a member that sees costs nothing; a member whose image can't be described is skipped for the next, the last one answers 502. The describer's own request is never described again, so a Vision set to a text-only model is turned away, not looped. Checked in a sandbox HOME against a local vendor: an image sent over Chat and over Anthropic to a text-only model reached it as the description, the describer was asked once per image, and the Settings row and its picker in light and dark.
2026-09-29 01:20:31 +08:00
routing: a request answered by another model than the one asked for is marked, from the model the vendor's reply names (v on Discord #feedback: 模型路由情况其实有的时候还是想知道的,比如之前 openai 会把 sol 降智到 luna 这样的,现在只有走 s2a 和 newapi 这些网关服务才能明确看到) — magpie read the tokens off each reply but not the model it says answered, so a vendor serving sol's requests with luna looked, on the Routing page, like sol answering. The reply's model is now kept as it goes by, never delayed or changed: on a relayed reply by the usage sniffer, which already reads every event and JSON body (Chat Completions' model in its JSON and each chunk, the Responses API's response.model in response.created/completed and model in its JSON, Anthropic's message.model in message_start and model in its JSON); on a translated one from the decoders' start event, which already carried it (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, and Gemini Code Assist's modelVersion), streamed or collected; on a Claude subscription's from the CLI's message_start; and on Codex's own models relayed to the ChatGPT backend. It goes in Usage.Served (and so the request log), each try's Served and the route's (the last try's, when it answered), with Swapped when it is another model than the one the try sent the vendor. Vendors mostly echo a dated or pinned name, which is the same model: the names are compared without a maker or path prefix (openai/, models/, Bedrock's us.anthropic.), case, and a version at the end — a date (-2025-08-07, -20250929, -06-05), a build number (-0613, -001), Bedrock's -v1:0, -latest, -preview — so gpt-5 answered as gpt-5-2025-08-07 or claude-3-5-sonnet-latest as claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is not marked, while gpt-5 as gpt-5-mini, gpt-5 as gpt-5.1, claude-opus-4 as claude-opus-4-1-… and deepseek-v3 as deepseek-v2 are. A reply that names no model marks nothing. The Routing page's Requests list puts an amber "served luna" (实际 luna) tag by the answer, its title saying what it means, and the request's story a line "requested sol · served luna" (请求 sol · 实际 luna) with the same sentence; no border stripe, and picking the request leaves the page where it is. Cursor, Devin, Kiro and Qoder name the model they were asked for themselves, so they are never marked.
2026-09-29 19:41:29 +08:00
providers: Claude Code is signed in to its next account once the one it is on is spent, as Codex is, and an account keeps its own affinity, backoff and usage across a switch (#208 Cyb3rN8: Claude Code 用自己的模型时,登录账号额度用满不会自动切换 · #209: Smart 选中的账号和 Claude Code 登录账号互不同步…切换登录账号还会把按 id 记的状态串到另一个账号上) — Claude Code on its own model asks Anthropic as the account it is signed in to, never through magpie, so with A spent its sessions got "You've hit your session limit" while the gateway had moved on to B. The Codex watcher (KeepCodexOnAnAccountWithRoom, now KeepOnAnAccountWithRoom, same place: started by the magpie serving the gateway, a minute in and every 5 minutes) now looks at Claude Code too: when the account it is signed in to is spent and another ticked account's allowance is known and has room, it is signed in to that one through SwitchLogin (credentials and .claude.json's oauthAccount), as Use on the Accounts page does; not when the Claude account was removed from magpie. The rule for #209: the sign-in follows Smart, not the other way round — it moves at the share Smart counts an account spent (provider.SpentShare = 98, which the gateway's usedShare now is), for Codex too (it moved at 100%). The Routing field of a Codex or Claude subscription with several accounts says so: routing picks the account for what comes through magpie; the agent on its own uses the one it is signed in to, moved on at 98%. Sessions already running keep the account they started with until restarted, as SwitchLogin says; routing Claude Code's own model through the gateway (the codexFailover way) is not done here. #209's second part was a real bug: the account the agent is on is the candidate "claude" and the others "claude@user", so a switch handed "claude" from A to B — a conversation A answered was kept on B and traced kept=true, and the Least used tokens and the backoff count followed the id. who(), routed.used and routed.failures are now keyed by restKey (provider@user, as rests already were); rest itself (group members, the trace) is unchanged. Tested with new TestClaudeSwitchedWhenSpent (sandbox HOME, keychain off, a fake usage endpoint: 97% stays, 98% signs Claude Code in to b — credentials and .claude.json — a stays ticked; on b it stays; both spent it stays), TestCodexSwitchedWhenUsedUp still passing, new TestLoginSwitchKeepsEachAccountItself (fails on main: the conversation went to b, kept) and new internal/gui/tests/routing-signin.test.cjs in Chromium and WebKit, en and zh; login-import and routing-kind GUI tests pass. go build -tags nogui (and GOOS=linux, GOOS=windows), go test -tags nogui ./... pass (TestUserPath, TestClaudeAccountNamedAsItsLogin, TestClaudeIdentityServedWhileAsked and TestCodexVersion timed out at 5s under the full run's load and pass on their own). Not tested against real Claude accounts or a running Claude Code.
2026-09-29 18:56:33 +08:00
agents: a provider switched off or removed, or its last account signed out, moves the agents on its models to others (#200: 希望关闭某个llm provider的时候,更改agent选择的model到可用的model … 关闭这个provider之后,第一次使用会报错,因为copilot/ 开头的模型不存在) — switching Copilot off took copilot/… out of the catalog and the agents' model lists, but an agent picked on one kept it in its config and its next request was refused as switched off. Now every field on one of magpie's models (the model, Claude Code's opus/sonnet/haiku/fable tiers, any other) whose model the change stopped serving is moved: to the same model from a provider still on, the same id first, else one spelt another way (claude-sonnet-4.5 and claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929), else back to the agent's own default (a Claude Code tier: following the main model). It is done around switching off, removing, a key removed or off, and a sign-in signed out or off, in the window, the tray panel, the TUI and the CLI; the page's status line, the TUI and the CLI say which agent went to what. A session started before the switch still asks for the old model: the gateway now takes a switched-off provider's model as unserved, so Claude Code's stand-in (its model as set now) answers it rather than a refusal. Tested in a sandbox HOME: Claude Code on the main model and three tiers plus Hermes, switched off and removed (same id, other spelling, default, a tier following), switched on again moving nothing; /api/provider/off returns the moves; the gateway serves a switched-off model through the stand-in (fails without the change) and still refuses it to an agent left on it
2026-09-29 17:56:43 +08:00
redact: a gateway's key in "key": "oc_sk_…" is masked, and Settings → Privacy takes the user's own masking rules (#195) — an OpenCode Go key in providers.json went to the vendor as it was: the API key rules wanted sk- with a hyphen, and a field called key alone was none of the secret field's names. Now a key of a gateway or relay, two to four letters and _sk_ (oc_sk_, or_sk_) with digits in it, is an API_KEY wherever it is, and a field named key and nothing more (not sort_key, monkey or obj.key) is a SECRET when its value is 16 or more letters and digits both, so a map's "key": "value" and key = "someIdentifier" are left alone; \"key\": \"…\" in JSON inside a string is found too. The secret field's names and its markers come from one list, so they can't drift apart, and of two rules finding the same value the first keeps it, so its placeholder no longer changes between an API_KEY and a SECRET from one request to the next. Masking rules, next to 脱敏词: a name for the placeholders (upper case letters, digits and _, 24 at most) and a prefix (then 8 or more key characters) or an RE2 regular expression, group 1 the value if it has one, masked with the secrets while 脱敏密钥 is on and put back as the others are, the user's name winning where one of magpie's finds the same value. They are set on their own: a pattern that doesn't compile, matches nothing at all, or is too long (300), a prefix under 3 or over 64, both at once, or more than 32 rules, is refused with the reason under the add row and what was typed kept. Tested: every row of the issue's table and the false positives, the rules' tidying, errors, stable placeholders, restore, overlaps, and kinds with digits in a stream; the settings file and the gateway's count_tokens with a rule; the page in a stub magpie web (add, a bad regex, remove, zh dark)
2026-09-29 15:26:01 +08:00
redact: a gateway's key in "key": "oc_sk_…" is masked, and Settings → Privacy takes the user's own masking rules (#195) — an OpenCode Go key in providers.json went to the vendor as it was: the API key rules wanted sk- with a hyphen, and a field called key alone was none of the secret field's names. Now a key of a gateway or relay, two to four letters and _sk_ (oc_sk_, or_sk_) with digits in it, is an API_KEY wherever it is, and a field named key and nothing more (not sort_key, monkey or obj.key) is a SECRET when its value is 16 or more letters and digits both, so a map's "key": "value" and key = "someIdentifier" are left alone; \"key\": \"…\" in JSON inside a string is found too. The secret field's names and its markers come from one list, so they can't drift apart, and of two rules finding the same value the first keeps it, so its placeholder no longer changes between an API_KEY and a SECRET from one request to the next. Masking rules, next to 脱敏词: a name for the placeholders (upper case letters, digits and _, 24 at most) and a prefix (then 8 or more key characters) or an RE2 regular expression, group 1 the value if it has one, masked with the secrets while 脱敏密钥 is on and put back as the others are, the user's name winning where one of magpie's finds the same value. They are set on their own: a pattern that doesn't compile, matches nothing at all, or is too long (300), a prefix under 3 or over 64, both at once, or more than 32 rules, is refused with the reason under the add row and what was typed kept. Tested: every row of the issue's table and the false positives, the rules' tidying, errors, stable placeholders, restore, overlaps, and kinds with digits in a stream; the settings file and the gateway's count_tokens with a rule; the page in a stub magpie web (add, a bad regex, remove, zh dark)
2026-09-29 15:26:01 +08:00
providers: Claude Code is signed in to its next account once the one it is on is spent, as Codex is, and an account keeps its own affinity, backoff and usage across a switch (#208 Cyb3rN8: Claude Code 用自己的模型时,登录账号额度用满不会自动切换 · #209: Smart 选中的账号和 Claude Code 登录账号互不同步…切换登录账号还会把按 id 记的状态串到另一个账号上) — Claude Code on its own model asks Anthropic as the account it is signed in to, never through magpie, so with A spent its sessions got "You've hit your session limit" while the gateway had moved on to B. The Codex watcher (KeepCodexOnAnAccountWithRoom, now KeepOnAnAccountWithRoom, same place: started by the magpie serving the gateway, a minute in and every 5 minutes) now looks at Claude Code too: when the account it is signed in to is spent and another ticked account's allowance is known and has room, it is signed in to that one through SwitchLogin (credentials and .claude.json's oauthAccount), as Use on the Accounts page does; not when the Claude account was removed from magpie. The rule for #209: the sign-in follows Smart, not the other way round — it moves at the share Smart counts an account spent (provider.SpentShare = 98, which the gateway's usedShare now is), for Codex too (it moved at 100%). The Routing field of a Codex or Claude subscription with several accounts says so: routing picks the account for what comes through magpie; the agent on its own uses the one it is signed in to, moved on at 98%. Sessions already running keep the account they started with until restarted, as SwitchLogin says; routing Claude Code's own model through the gateway (the codexFailover way) is not done here. #209's second part was a real bug: the account the agent is on is the candidate "claude" and the others "claude@user", so a switch handed "claude" from A to B — a conversation A answered was kept on B and traced kept=true, and the Least used tokens and the backoff count followed the id. who(), routed.used and routed.failures are now keyed by restKey (provider@user, as rests already were); rest itself (group members, the trace) is unchanged. Tested with new TestClaudeSwitchedWhenSpent (sandbox HOME, keychain off, a fake usage endpoint: 97% stays, 98% signs Claude Code in to b — credentials and .claude.json — a stays ticked; on b it stays; both spent it stays), TestCodexSwitchedWhenUsedUp still passing, new TestLoginSwitchKeepsEachAccountItself (fails on main: the conversation went to b, kept) and new internal/gui/tests/routing-signin.test.cjs in Chromium and WebKit, en and zh; login-import and routing-kind GUI tests pass. go build -tags nogui (and GOOS=linux, GOOS=windows), go test -tags nogui ./... pass (TestUserPath, TestClaudeAccountNamedAsItsLogin, TestClaudeIdentityServedWhileAsked and TestCodexVersion timed out at 5s under the full run's load and pass on their own). Not tested against real Claude accounts or a running Claude Code.
2026-09-29 18:56:33 +08:00
gateway: a model that can't see images is given what a model that can says of them (让Magpie支持配置图像识别模型) — until now an image sent to a model the catalog knows takes text only was turned away in the latest turn and left out of older turns and tool results, so an agent on DeepSeek, GLM or any text-only model couldn't be shown a screenshot at all. Now each image in such a request is described once by the vision model and the description goes in its place, in every protocol (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, Gemini), current turn, older turns and tool results alike: "[Image, as <model> describes it for this model, which can't see images:] … [End of the image's description]". The describer is asked through the gateway itself (User-Agent magpie-vision/1, recorded as agent magpie), with a system prompt to transcribe text, code, errors and UI state exactly and not to answer or guess; images are described four at a time, and a description is kept (256, by model+image) since an agent sends a conversation's images again every turn, a failure not kept. An image of the latest turn that can't be described is a 502 saying why; one in an older turn is left out as before. Settings → Images → Image recognition picks the model: Automatic (a small model that sees — a Claude account's, a Codex account's, the cheapest of an API key's, another account's), Off (images turned away as before), or any model or group that sees; an id that doesn't resolve is refused. In a routing group the description is made only when a text-only member is actually tried, so a rule that routes images to a member that sees costs nothing; a member whose image can't be described is skipped for the next, the last one answers 502. The describer's own request is never described again, so a Vision set to a text-only model is turned away, not looped. Checked in a sandbox HOME against a local vendor: an image sent over Chat and over Anthropic to a text-only model reached it as the description, the describer was asked once per image, and the Settings row and its picker in light and dark.
2026-09-29 01:20:31 +08:00
routing: a request answered by another model than the one asked for is marked, from the model the vendor's reply names (v on Discord #feedback: 模型路由情况其实有的时候还是想知道的,比如之前 openai 会把 sol 降智到 luna 这样的,现在只有走 s2a 和 newapi 这些网关服务才能明确看到) — magpie read the tokens off each reply but not the model it says answered, so a vendor serving sol's requests with luna looked, on the Routing page, like sol answering. The reply's model is now kept as it goes by, never delayed or changed: on a relayed reply by the usage sniffer, which already reads every event and JSON body (Chat Completions' model in its JSON and each chunk, the Responses API's response.model in response.created/completed and model in its JSON, Anthropic's message.model in message_start and model in its JSON); on a translated one from the decoders' start event, which already carried it (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, and Gemini Code Assist's modelVersion), streamed or collected; on a Claude subscription's from the CLI's message_start; and on Codex's own models relayed to the ChatGPT backend. It goes in Usage.Served (and so the request log), each try's Served and the route's (the last try's, when it answered), with Swapped when it is another model than the one the try sent the vendor. Vendors mostly echo a dated or pinned name, which is the same model: the names are compared without a maker or path prefix (openai/, models/, Bedrock's us.anthropic.), case, and a version at the end — a date (-2025-08-07, -20250929, -06-05), a build number (-0613, -001), Bedrock's -v1:0, -latest, -preview — so gpt-5 answered as gpt-5-2025-08-07 or claude-3-5-sonnet-latest as claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is not marked, while gpt-5 as gpt-5-mini, gpt-5 as gpt-5.1, claude-opus-4 as claude-opus-4-1-… and deepseek-v3 as deepseek-v2 are. A reply that names no model marks nothing. The Routing page's Requests list puts an amber "served luna" (实际 luna) tag by the answer, its title saying what it means, and the request's story a line "requested sol · served luna" (请求 sol · 实际 luna) with the same sentence; no border stripe, and picking the request leaves the page where it is. Cursor, Devin, Kiro and Qoder name the model they were asked for themselves, so they are never marked.
2026-09-29 19:41:29 +08:00
routing: a request answered by another model than the one asked for is marked, from the model the vendor's reply names (v on Discord #feedback: 模型路由情况其实有的时候还是想知道的,比如之前 openai 会把 sol 降智到 luna 这样的,现在只有走 s2a 和 newapi 这些网关服务才能明确看到) — magpie read the tokens off each reply but not the model it says answered, so a vendor serving sol's requests with luna looked, on the Routing page, like sol answering. The reply's model is now kept as it goes by, never delayed or changed: on a relayed reply by the usage sniffer, which already reads every event and JSON body (Chat Completions' model in its JSON and each chunk, the Responses API's response.model in response.created/completed and model in its JSON, Anthropic's message.model in message_start and model in its JSON); on a translated one from the decoders' start event, which already carried it (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, and Gemini Code Assist's modelVersion), streamed or collected; on a Claude subscription's from the CLI's message_start; and on Codex's own models relayed to the ChatGPT backend. It goes in Usage.Served (and so the request log), each try's Served and the route's (the last try's, when it answered), with Swapped when it is another model than the one the try sent the vendor. Vendors mostly echo a dated or pinned name, which is the same model: the names are compared without a maker or path prefix (openai/, models/, Bedrock's us.anthropic.), case, and a version at the end — a date (-2025-08-07, -20250929, -06-05), a build number (-0613, -001), Bedrock's -v1:0, -latest, -preview — so gpt-5 answered as gpt-5-2025-08-07 or claude-3-5-sonnet-latest as claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is not marked, while gpt-5 as gpt-5-mini, gpt-5 as gpt-5.1, claude-opus-4 as claude-opus-4-1-… and deepseek-v3 as deepseek-v2 are. A reply that names no model marks nothing. The Routing page's Requests list puts an amber "served luna" (实际 luna) tag by the answer, its title saying what it means, and the request's story a line "requested sol · served luna" (请求 sol · 实际 luna) with the same sentence; no border stripe, and picking the request leaves the page where it is. Cursor, Devin, Kiro and Qoder name the model they were asked for themselves, so they are never marked.
2026-09-29 19:41:29 +08:00
routing: a request answered by another model than the one asked for is marked, from the model the vendor's reply names (v on Discord #feedback: 模型路由情况其实有的时候还是想知道的,比如之前 openai 会把 sol 降智到 luna 这样的,现在只有走 s2a 和 newapi 这些网关服务才能明确看到) — magpie read the tokens off each reply but not the model it says answered, so a vendor serving sol's requests with luna looked, on the Routing page, like sol answering. The reply's model is now kept as it goes by, never delayed or changed: on a relayed reply by the usage sniffer, which already reads every event and JSON body (Chat Completions' model in its JSON and each chunk, the Responses API's response.model in response.created/completed and model in its JSON, Anthropic's message.model in message_start and model in its JSON); on a translated one from the decoders' start event, which already carried it (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, and Gemini Code Assist's modelVersion), streamed or collected; on a Claude subscription's from the CLI's message_start; and on Codex's own models relayed to the ChatGPT backend. It goes in Usage.Served (and so the request log), each try's Served and the route's (the last try's, when it answered), with Swapped when it is another model than the one the try sent the vendor. Vendors mostly echo a dated or pinned name, which is the same model: the names are compared without a maker or path prefix (openai/, models/, Bedrock's us.anthropic.), case, and a version at the end — a date (-2025-08-07, -20250929, -06-05), a build number (-0613, -001), Bedrock's -v1:0, -latest, -preview — so gpt-5 answered as gpt-5-2025-08-07 or claude-3-5-sonnet-latest as claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 is not marked, while gpt-5 as gpt-5-mini, gpt-5 as gpt-5.1, claude-opus-4 as claude-opus-4-1-… and deepseek-v3 as deepseek-v2 are. A reply that names no model marks nothing. The Routing page's Requests list puts an amber "served luna" (实际 luna) tag by the answer, its title saying what it means, and the request's story a line "requested sol · served luna" (请求 sol · 实际 luna) with the same sentence; no border stripe, and picking the request leaves the page where it is. Cursor, Devin, Kiro and Qoder name the model they were asked for themselves, so they are never marked.
2026-09-29 19:41:29 +08:00
usage: a streamed reply's time to its first token is kept, and its first text's (#196: usage 记录首字延迟(TTFT),用于计算模型的真实生成速度) — usage.jsonl had only a call's whole ms and its out tokens, so how fast a model writes couldn't be told from how long it waited or thought. The reply is now read as it goes to the agent, in the agent's protocol whatever the vendor spoke (Anthropic content_block_delta text/thinking/input_json and a tool_use's start, Chat content/reasoning_content/reasoning/tool_calls, Responses output_text/reasoning/function_call_arguments deltas and a function call's start, Gemini parts), and each record gets ttft_ms to the first content and first_text_ms to the first text, counted from the request as ms is, so ms − ttft_ms is the writing time; a reply that isn't streamed gets neither, and omitempty leaves old records as they were. Only the stream's events up to its first text are read (a JSON reply, or past 8 MB, not at all). Each try in the routing trace keeps its own from when it was sent, so a group that fails over shows which member was slow, and the route, the request log and the Codex backend's relay keep them too. Shown on the Routing page (TTFT in the list, first token / first text / tok/s in a try's story), in the Gateway's request log, and on the Usage page and in magpie usage per model as the mean TTFT and tok/s = out ÷ (ms − ttft) over the answered streamed calls. Tested with fake vendors streaming a gap apart for Anthropic, Chat and Responses, as they came and translated (Chat from Anthropic, Responses from Chat), the ChatGPT backend without a Content-Type, a whole reply, a group whose first member fails (its try untimed, the second's timed from its own start, the request's including the failed try), each protocol's events and split writes, and the summary's sums; the GUI's browser tests pass
2026-09-29 16:40:03 +08:00
usage: a streamed reply's time to its first token is kept, and its first text's (#196: usage 记录首字延迟(TTFT),用于计算模型的真实生成速度) — usage.jsonl had only a call's whole ms and its out tokens, so how fast a model writes couldn't be told from how long it waited or thought. The reply is now read as it goes to the agent, in the agent's protocol whatever the vendor spoke (Anthropic content_block_delta text/thinking/input_json and a tool_use's start, Chat content/reasoning_content/reasoning/tool_calls, Responses output_text/reasoning/function_call_arguments deltas and a function call's start, Gemini parts), and each record gets ttft_ms to the first content and first_text_ms to the first text, counted from the request as ms is, so ms − ttft_ms is the writing time; a reply that isn't streamed gets neither, and omitempty leaves old records as they were. Only the stream's events up to its first text are read (a JSON reply, or past 8 MB, not at all). Each try in the routing trace keeps its own from when it was sent, so a group that fails over shows which member was slow, and the route, the request log and the Codex backend's relay keep them too. Shown on the Routing page (TTFT in the list, first token / first text / tok/s in a try's story), in the Gateway's request log, and on the Usage page and in magpie usage per model as the mean TTFT and tok/s = out ÷ (ms − ttft) over the answered streamed calls. Tested with fake vendors streaming a gap apart for Anthropic, Chat and Responses, as they came and translated (Chat from Anthropic, Responses from Chat), the ChatGPT backend without a Content-Type, a whole reply, a group whose first member fails (its try untimed, the second's timed from its own start, the request's including the failed try), each protocol's events and split writes, and the summary's sums; the GUI's browser tests pass
2026-09-29 16:40:03 +08:00
gateway: a model that can't see images is given what a model that can says of them (让Magpie支持配置图像识别模型) — until now an image sent to a model the catalog knows takes text only was turned away in the latest turn and left out of older turns and tool results, so an agent on DeepSeek, GLM or any text-only model couldn't be shown a screenshot at all. Now each image in such a request is described once by the vision model and the description goes in its place, in every protocol (Chat, Responses, Anthropic, Gemini), current turn, older turns and tool results alike: "[Image, as <model> describes it for this model, which can't see images:] … [End of the image's description]". The describer is asked through the gateway itself (User-Agent magpie-vision/1, recorded as agent magpie), with a system prompt to transcribe text, code, errors and UI state exactly and not to answer or guess; images are described four at a time, and a description is kept (256, by model+image) since an agent sends a conversation's images again every turn, a failure not kept. An image of the latest turn that can't be described is a 502 saying why; one in an older turn is left out as before. Settings → Images → Image recognition picks the model: Automatic (a small model that sees — a Claude account's, a Codex account's, the cheapest of an API key's, another account's), Off (images turned away as before), or any model or group that sees; an id that doesn't resolve is refused. In a routing group the description is made only when a text-only member is actually tried, so a rule that routes images to a member that sees costs nothing; a member whose image can't be described is skipped for the next, the last one answers 502. The describer's own request is never described again, so a Vision set to a text-only model is turned away, not looped. Checked in a sandbox HOME against a local vendor: an image sent over Chat and over Anthropic to a text-only model reached it as the description, the describer was asked once per image, and the Settings row and its picker in light and dark.
2026-09-29 01:20:31 +08:00