Files
msime-windows/server/tests
fanlusky a898c3b11c feat(candidate): Ctrl+Enter 上屏候选右侧的译文
候选框开着且高亮候选带译文时,Ctrl+Enter 上屏那条译文而不是候选本身。
译文只有一条就直接上屏;有多条时把候选框整个换成这几条译义,空格/数字键
照常选一条上屏。

TSF 端原先在分类器最前面把所有 Ctrl 组合都还给应用,Ctrl+Enter 到不了
Server。现在在那条拦截之前先判一次:候选框开着才认,否则组合仍归应用。
认下来的键走既有的 FUNCTION_SERVER_CANDIDATE_KEY 通道,由 Server 决定
是上屏(CommitExactText)还是只开一个新候选页(NavigationIgnored)。

译文页复用同一份 candidate_ui.items,因此云/AI/英文/emoji/颜文字这些异步
回调和候选扩展都要在这个子模式下让路,否则会把译文冲掉。输入串全程没动,
退出时把存下来的 items 和页码原样放回去即可。译文页上的空格/数字键只回
Normal / OutofRange——SELECT_BY_NUMBER 的 TSF 路径只认这两种。
2026-09-17 20:21:56 +08:00
..
2026-06-20 22:11:00 +08:00
2025-04-20 17:44:33 +08:00
2025-04-21 18:32:45 +08:00

Tests

This project now includes a lightweight regression test target wired into the main CMake build.

What It Covers

Current tests focus on high-value IME behaviors that are easy to accidentally break during refactors:

  • shuangpin scheme request construction
  • quanpin scheme request construction
  • case-preserving shuangpin segmentation
  • full-helpcode detection
  • engine + shuangpin continuation behavior
  • cloud suggestion trigger timing for shuangpin

The goal is not to fully simulate the whole IME UI pipeline yet. The goal is to protect the core input rules and session behavior.

Build and run

Run these commands from the MSIME-Windows repository root after preparing vcpkg and Boost with python server/scripts/prepare_env.py:

python scripts/product_lock.py fetch-dictionaries --staging-root .
if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) { throw 'Dictionary verification failed' }
$env:LOCALAPPDATA = Join-Path $PWD 'build/test-data/user-local'
$env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR = Join-Path $env:LOCALAPPDATA 'metasequoiaime'
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR | Out-Null
Copy-Item MetasequoiaImeDict/out/* $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR -Force
Copy-Item engine/helpcode/helpcodes $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR -Recurse -Force
Copy-Item server/assets/tables/* $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR -Force
Copy-Item server/assets/config/config.toml $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR -Force
.\server\tests\scripts\llaunch.ps1 -Configuration Release

Use a dedicated PowerShell terminal: these environment variables isolate both Windows helpers and the shared Engine from the installed user's data for the rest of that session. The scripts run CTest; they do not launch the interactive Server, install or register the input method. CI additionally runs the native Win32/x64 pipe probe after building the full Server.

Tests belong to the Server CMake project, which provides the Engine, GUI and third-party targets. server/tests/CMakeLists.txt is an add_subdirectory input, not an independent project. The obsolete test presets have been removed; an old locally generated server/tests/CMakePresets.json is no longer used.

Once test data is prepared, the convenience scripts work from any directory:

.\server\tests\scripts\llaunch.ps1 -Configuration Release  # build, then CTest
.\server\tests\scripts\lrun.ps1 -Configuration Release     # CTest only

Omitting -Configuration selects Debug in server/build; Release uses server/build-release. Both compile MetasequoiaImeServerTests and test_webview_contract in the parent build tree. Configuration, compilation, test failures and an empty CTest registry return failure rather than launching a stale executable or reporting success.

The equivalent direct CTest command from the repository root is:

ctest --test-dir server/build-release -C Release --output-on-failure --no-tests=error

Test Layout

  • tests/src/main.cpp
    • tiny custom test runner
  • tests/includes/test_framework.h
    • lightweight assertion helpers
  • tests/src/test_shuangpin_scheme.cpp
    • shuangpin scheme unit tests
  • tests/src/test_quanpin_scheme.cpp
    • quanpin scheme unit tests
  • tests/src/test_shuangpin_query.cpp
    • query/helper function tests
  • tests/src/test_engine_shuangpin_session.cpp
    • session-level behavior tests

When you change input behavior, add a regression test if the change affects:

  • input segmentation
  • space/enter/backspace behavior
  • helpcode handling
  • continuation after candidate selection
  • create-word flow
  • cloud suggestion timing

The best tests in this project are the ones that capture a concrete input example that previously broke.