Files
msime-windows/server/tests
fanlusky 42cff6de4a fix(server): WebView2 选词不再白等渲染同步超时
WebView2 下几乎每次空格/数字选词都等满渲染同步上限(日志 waited_ms 82-94,
rendered 恒比 current 小 1),体感为上屏顿一下。

每个按键 worker 会以相同内容发布两次页面:第一次走 content-only,回显在
异步 DOM 回调里;第二次命中 dedup,立即回显新代数。随后迟到的 DOM 回调把
回显改回旧代数,选词就一直等到超时。D2D 同步回显,不受影响。

- 渲染回显代数只进不退(AdvanceRenderedCandidateGeneration),迟到的旧回显
  不再覆盖新回显。
- folded-inflight 分支补上回显:进行中的 FineTune 只回显它捕获的那一页,
  之后折叠进来的页面此前永远没有回显。
2026-09-27 10:24:50 +08:00
..
2026-06-20 22:11:00 +08:00
2025-04-20 17:44:33 +08:00
2025-04-21 18:32:45 +08:00

Tests

This project now includes a lightweight regression test target wired into the main CMake build.

What It Covers

Current tests focus on high-value IME behaviors that are easy to accidentally break during refactors:

  • shuangpin scheme request construction
  • quanpin scheme request construction
  • case-preserving shuangpin segmentation
  • full-helpcode detection
  • engine + shuangpin continuation behavior
  • cloud suggestion trigger timing for shuangpin

The goal is not to fully simulate the whole IME UI pipeline yet. The goal is to protect the core input rules and session behavior.

Build and run

Run these commands from the MSIME-Windows repository root after preparing vcpkg and Boost with python server/scripts/prepare_env.py:

python scripts/product_lock.py fetch-dictionaries --staging-root .
if ($LASTEXITCODE -ne 0) { throw 'Dictionary verification failed' }
$env:LOCALAPPDATA = Join-Path $PWD 'build/test-data/user-local'
$env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR = Join-Path $env:LOCALAPPDATA 'metasequoiaime'
New-Item -ItemType Directory -Force $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR | Out-Null
Copy-Item MetasequoiaImeDict/out/* $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR -Force
Copy-Item engine/helpcode/helpcodes $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR -Recurse -Force
Copy-Item server/assets/tables/* $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR -Force
Copy-Item server/assets/config/config.toml $env:METASEQUOIA_IME_DATA_DIR -Force
.\server\tests\scripts\llaunch.ps1 -Configuration Release

Use a dedicated PowerShell terminal: these environment variables isolate both Windows helpers and the shared Engine from the installed user's data for the rest of that session. The scripts run CTest; they do not launch the interactive Server, install or register the input method. CI additionally runs the native Win32/x64 pipe probe after building the full Server.

Tests belong to the Server CMake project, which provides the Engine, GUI and third-party targets. server/tests/CMakeLists.txt is an add_subdirectory input, not an independent project. The obsolete test presets have been removed; an old locally generated server/tests/CMakePresets.json is no longer used.

Once test data is prepared, the convenience scripts work from any directory:

.\server\tests\scripts\llaunch.ps1 -Configuration Release  # build, then CTest
.\server\tests\scripts\lrun.ps1 -Configuration Release     # CTest only

Omitting -Configuration selects Debug in server/build; Release uses server/build-release. Both compile MetasequoiaImeServerTests and test_webview_contract in the parent build tree. Configuration, compilation, test failures and an empty CTest registry return failure rather than launching a stale executable or reporting success.

The equivalent direct CTest command from the repository root is:

ctest --test-dir server/build-release -C Release --output-on-failure --no-tests=error

Test Layout

  • tests/src/main.cpp
    • tiny custom test runner
  • tests/includes/test_framework.h
    • lightweight assertion helpers
  • tests/src/test_shuangpin_scheme.cpp
    • shuangpin scheme unit tests
  • tests/src/test_quanpin_scheme.cpp
    • quanpin scheme unit tests
  • tests/src/test_shuangpin_query.cpp
    • query/helper function tests
  • tests/src/test_engine_shuangpin_session.cpp
    • session-level behavior tests

When you change input behavior, add a regression test if the change affects:

  • input segmentation
  • space/enter/backspace behavior
  • helpcode handling
  • continuation after candidate selection
  • create-word flow
  • cloud suggestion timing

The best tests in this project are the ones that capture a concrete input example that previously broke.