Revise model recommendations in README
Updated model recommendations for equipment extraction, character generation, and image generation. Added notes on budget-friendly alternatives and potential limitations of non-Pro models.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
408c780591
commit
cef04fb60b
1 file changed
+4
-2
@@ -82,9 +82,11 @@ Forgery requires API keys for AI generation services (Google Gemini and/or OpenA
|
||||
|
||||
## Model Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
For optimal results in both equipment extraction and high-fidelity character generation, it is highly recommended to use the **Nana Banana Pro** model. This model provides superior precision for isolating modular assets and ensures the most consistent "looks" when remixing styles and accessories.
|
||||
For text generation, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5 Mini are typically sufficient for most use cases.
|
||||
|
||||
For the Refine step, the standard Nano Banana model is typically sufficient to handle iterative adjustments and polish without the need for the Pro-level tier.
|
||||
For image generation, Nanao Banana Pro delivers the highest-quality results and is generally the best choice. However, if cost is a concern, you can consider Nano Banana (non-Pro) or GPT Image 1.5 as more budget-friendly alternatives.
|
||||
|
||||
Keep in mind that Nano Banana (non-Pro) may struggle during the look generation step, especially when the prompt includes multiple pieces of equipment or complex visual elements.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user